首页> 外文OA文献 >Deep learning is a good steganalysis tool when embedding key is reused for different images, even if there is a cover source-mismatch
【2h】

Deep learning is a good steganalysis tool when embedding key is reused for different images, even if there is a cover source-mismatch

机译:当重用嵌入密钥时,深度学习是一种很好的隐写分析工具   对于不同的图像,即使存在封面源不匹配

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since the BOSS competition, in 2010, most steganalysis approaches use alearning methodology involving two steps: feature extraction, such as the RichModels (RM), for the image representation, and use of the Ensemble Classifier(EC) for the learning step. In 2015, Qian et al. have shown that the use of adeep learning approach that jointly learns and computes the features, is verypromising for the steganalysis. In this paper, we follow-up the study of Qianet al., and show that, due to intrinsic joint minimization, the resultsobtained from a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) or a Fully Connected NeuralNetwork (FNN), if well parameterized, surpass the conventional use of a RM withan EC. First, numerous experiments were conducted in order to find the best "shape " of the CNN. Second, experiments were carried out in the clairvoyantscenario in order to compare the CNN and FNN to an RM with an EC. The resultsshow more than 16% reduction in the classification error with our CNN or FNN.Third, experiments were also performed in a cover-source mismatch setting. Theresults show that the CNN and FNN are naturally robust to the mismatch problem.In Addition to the experiments, we provide discussions on the internalmechanisms of a CNN, and weave links with some previously stated ideas, inorder to understand the impressive results we obtained.
机译:自2010年BOSS竞赛以来,大多数隐写分析方法都使用包含两个步骤的学习方法:特征提取(例如RichModels(RM))用于图像表示,而Ensemble Classifier(EC)用于学习步骤。 2015年,Qian等。研究表明,结合学习和计算特征的深度学习方法对于隐写分析很有用。在本文中,我们对Qianet等人的研究进行了跟踪,结果表明,由于固有联合最小化,如果参数化良好,则从卷积神经网络(CNN)或全连接神经网络(FNN)获得的结果将超过RM与EC的常规用法。首先,为了找到CNN的最佳“形状”,进行了大量实验。其次,在透视环境中进行了实验,以便将CNN和FNN与带有EC的RM进行比较。结果表明,使用我们的CNN或FNN可以将分类错误减少16%以上。第三,还在掩盖来源不匹配的设置下进行了实验。结果表明,CNN和FNN对于不匹配问题具有很强的鲁棒性。除了实验之外,我们还讨论了CNN的内部机制,并与以前提到的观点进行了编织,以了解我们获得的令人印象深刻的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号